Tuesday 10 November 2015

Crit Group feedback november

Crit Group Feedback (November)



  • Richard Hamilton looking (one with chairs): Wacky and subversive.
  • After reading: Text/narrative draws more attention. Sets a tone.
  • Trapped in their own beauty.
  • The text continues to make sense (good).
  • Slick images, styled & touched up, amateur covering opposite to image meaning. Precise materials, deliberate placement.
  • Why certain materials? Strong lead to environment.
  • Individually each one different - pink connotes sex.
  • Trapped - beaten up - not sure - trapped - sexual.
  • Object, no gaze, maybe swap to other body parts?
  • All are provocative except one - string one.
  • De-personal.
  • Interested in colours: Yellow and pink - childlike and weird.
  • Feminism & objectification.
  • Floral & yellow: curious about choices.
  • Look articulate not experimental - yellow between legs.
  • Liked the stitched element.
  • Words crossed out don't flow well with the image (string piece).
  • How far is too far? (In regards to subverting images).
  • Work as individual pieces, what would happen when placed in groups?
  • They don't say eating disorders.
  • Ethical side.
  • Terry Richardson.
  • Why am I making?
  • Exploitative or not? Use personal story?
  • Do I want to be literal/obvious?
  • PETA Campaigns
  • Floral - Housewife: Cath Kidson.
  • Anti-feminist world.
  • Hard to subvert more, becomes too corny/deliberate.

0 comments:

Post a Comment