Crit Group feedback november
Crit Group Feedback (November)
- Richard Hamilton looking (one with chairs): Wacky and subversive.
- After reading: Text/narrative draws more attention. Sets a tone.
- Trapped in their own beauty.
- The text continues to make sense (good).
- Slick images, styled & touched up, amateur covering opposite to image meaning. Precise materials, deliberate placement.
- Why certain materials? Strong lead to environment.
- Individually each one different - pink connotes sex.
- Trapped - beaten up - not sure - trapped - sexual.
- Object, no gaze, maybe swap to other body parts?
- All are provocative except one - string one.
- De-personal.
- Interested in colours: Yellow and pink - childlike and weird.
- Feminism & objectification.
- Floral & yellow: curious about choices.
- Look articulate not experimental - yellow between legs.
- Liked the stitched element.
- Words crossed out don't flow well with the image (string piece).
- How far is too far? (In regards to subverting images).
- Work as individual pieces, what would happen when placed in groups?
- They don't say eating disorders.
- Ethical side.
- Terry Richardson.
- Why am I making?
- Exploitative or not? Use personal story?
- Do I want to be literal/obvious?
- PETA Campaigns
- Floral - Housewife: Cath Kidson.
- Anti-feminist world.
- Hard to subvert more, becomes too corny/deliberate.
0 comments:
Post a Comment